Jump to content

Talk:Dabru Emet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for posting this. Are we allowed to edit it? --Ed Poor

We can edit the article, but for historical accuracy, we cannot edit the text of the quote itself; Its a quote, after all. However, we can cut and paste from the article, insert it somewhere else, and then edit it there.

Can't the text be transwikied to Wikisource, with the background remaining here? JFW | T@lk 10:11, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I don't think there's a problem with including the source at Wikisource, but given how short the text is, I don't think that removing it completely to Wikisource simply because it's source text truly serves the purpose of Wikisource which, at least as I understand it, is designed to be a repository of source texts that are significantly more extensive in length and interest than the relatively few paragraphs of the Dabru Emet statement. Tomer TALK 08:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article concentrates on negative Jewish responses, without positive Jewish or any Christian responses. Balance? ABShippee

Historical characterizations of Judaism


A previous version said "Throughout the nearly two millennia of Jewish exile, Christians have tended to characterize Judaism as a failed religion or, at best, a religion that prepared the way for, and is completed in, Christianity," but the phrase "a failed religion" was removed. While it would need specific documentation, which I don't have at hand, I believe such a claim, i.e., that some influential Christians referred to Judaism as failed or used some similar idea or terminology, is (alas) justified. The whole topic is tricky (one wonders if any significant statement would be seen as NPOV by all), and perhaps best not dealt with here, in so short a space. The phrase "have tended" is vague in a spot needing precision: does it mean most Christians by number? Most official institutional responses? Most important or leading Christian intellectuals?

Good luck to whoever comes up with a good fix! ABShippee (talk) 22:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. I’m not at all experienced with Wikipedia editing . I found your username by clicking talk and current discussions .the reason is that I believe there is something strange in the Dabru Emet article . One line seems odd “Part of the Muslim tradiiton”. Anyway apologies for disturbing you. DabruEmet (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dabru Emet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]